Nadler & Lofgren Seek GAO Investigation Into Improper Sharing of DACA Recipients' Personal Information Within DHS
WASHINGTON, DC – Today, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and Immigration and Citizenship Chair Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) asked the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to open an investigation into the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) following reports that the agency is improperly sharing personal information of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP). DACA was established on the promise that the personal information of recipients would not be shared with ICE and CBP except under limited circumstances.
Full text of the letter can be found below and here:
June 4, 2020
The Honorable Gene Dodaro
U.S. Government Accountability Office
441 G Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20548
Dear Mr. Dodaro,
I am writing to request that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) undertake an investigation in response to recently disclosed documents showing that various Department of Homeland Security (DHS) components have access to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) data relating to the adjudication of applications for immigration benefits. Specifically, I am concerned about the ability of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to access personal information related to individuals approved for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).
When then-DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano established DACA in 2012, the Obama Administration assured DACA requestors that USCIS would not share their personal information with ICE and CBP except under limited circumstances. Hundreds of thousands of young Americans relying on this assurance came forward to apply for deferred action.
However, according to documents obtained by ProPublica in April 2020, it appears ICE has long had the ability to access the personal information of DACA recipients. These recently released documents have created confusion as to what information has already been shared with ICE and CBP as it relates to DACA recipients, and whether such information could be used for enforcement purposes. These disclosures are all the more concerning as ICE repeatedly has stated that the agency is prepared to remove DACA recipients with final orders of removal if the Supreme Court ends DACA.
For these reasons, I respectfully request GAO conduct an investigation into the following issues:
1. Please identify all DHS databases and information-sharing systems that are maintained or utilized by USCIS in the adjudication of applications, petitions, or other requests for immigration benefits, including for fraud prevention purposes.
2. Of the databases and information-sharing systems identified in Question 1, please identify those systems to which ICE and/or CBP have access, the type and nature of such access, and the date on which ICE and/or CBP were granted such access.
3. Of the databases and information-sharing systems identified in Question 2:
To the extent that ICE or CBP only have access to a portion of the data or information contained in the database or system, please describe how such access is limited and specify the information fields to which ICE or CBP have access.
Please specify the ICE or CBP positions (agent, officer, manager, Director, etc.) that are authorized to access this information.
If ICE or CBP requires permission from USCIS to access all or a portion of information contained in a database or system, please specify the USCIS officials (including position titles) that are authorized to grant such permission.
Can queries be run in batch format (i.e. seeking information on more than one person through a single search)?
Please specify the information (name, A number, address, etc.) that is required for ICE or CBP to query the database or system and access information on an individual or, if batch queries can be processed, a group of individuals.
Describe how each database or system ensures that information is only accessed by authorized users and tracks queries run by individual users.
For each database or system, how many queries have been run by ICE or CBP officials to access information on DACA requestors or recipients?
4. Please identify each database that contains information provided by DACA requestors or recipients, and the type and nature of the information related to such individuals contained in each database?
5. What internal and external policies or procedures govern ICE or CBP’s access to the personal information of DACA requestors or recipients?
6. Which offices or directorates are responsible for developing policies governing ICE or CBP access to USCIS databases or other information, including information related to DACA requestors or recipients? Do such policies require approval from a particular official, or level of official, before access to USCIS databases or other information can be obtained? If so, what official, or level of official may provide such approval?
7. Please describe the changes, if any, to policies or procedures concerning DACA-related information-sharing and access since the inception of the DACA program in 2012.
8. Has DHS instructed USCIS to provide ICE or CBP access to information related to DACA requestors or recipients? If so, when did such instruction occur, and what was the reasoning for the instruction?
9. With respect to any database or information system queries, or other requests for information, on DACA requestors or recipients by ICE or CBP since the commencement of the DACA program in 2012, please provide—
The information that was requested;
The individuals (positions) or entities that made the request or initiated the transmission;
Whether the request was fulfilled by USCIS and if so, the information that was provided to ICE or CBP and the date on which such information was provided.
To the extent that information was provided to ICE or CBP, whether it was used for enforcement purposes and, if not, the purpose for which it was used.
Thank you for your cooperation and attention to this request.