Government Surveillance

Our surveillance laws provide intelligence and law enforcement agencies with vast powers, but overbroad government surveillance is harmful to both civil liberties and business interests alike. Online services are premised on user trust, and that trust is undermined by loose rules for government access to user data.

Americans consistently cite government tracking as a top concern, and service providers have repeatedly noted that some prospective clients are reluctant to store their data in the U.S. due to the perception of weak rules for government access. We must establish clear rules for government collection of data that protect individual privacy and avoid burdening businesses in a way without harming legitimate law enforcement and national security priorities.

Please click on the following links to learn more about legislation Zoe has authored:

  • USA Rights Act: A bipartisan bill to reform a sweeping, secretive government spying program to protect the Constitutional rights of Americans, while giving intelligence agencies authority to target foreign terrorists, criminals and other overseas intelligence targets.
  • The Secure Data Act: To protect Americans’ privacy and data security by prohibiting surveillance agencies from requiring or compelling surveillance “backdoors” in products and services.
  • Online Communications and Geolocation Protection Act:  This bipartisan bill updates the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) to give Internet users greater privacy from law enforcement data requests. It requires the government to get a warrant to obtain users’ online communications content (such as email messages) and geolocation information (such as cell phone tracking).
  • Surveillance Order Reporting ActThis bipartisan bill helps gives Americans a better idea of the scale of government surveillance.  It authorizes Internet and telecommunications companies to publicly report an estimate of the number of government surveillance orders they receive and the number of user accounts affected by those orders.

More on Government Surveillance

April 21, 2021 Press Release
"It is necessary to close the data broker loophole that allows the government to buy some of our most sensitive personal data – like location records."
May 27, 2020 Press Release
"I am voting for the FISA reauthorization bill today that includes the Lee-Leahy amendment that improves privacy protections by increasing the use of the amici curiae and broadening their access to information."
May 26, 2020 Press Release
"After extensive bicameral, bipartisan deliberations, there will be a vote to include a final significant reform to Section 215 that protects Americans’ civil liberties."
May 20, 2020 Press Release
"The Lofgren-Davidson amendment would prohibit the collection of Americans’ internet search history and web browsing data without a warrant."
May 13, 2020 Press Release
"Together, the amendments proposed by Senators Lee and Leahy and Senators Wyden and Daines would dramatically improve privacy protections, and we encourage Senators to support Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights by passing these amendments."
March 11, 2020 Press Release
"It’s unfortunate that this bill does not include significant reforms that are necessary to protect Americans’ civil liberties."
March 10, 2020 Press Release
"We applaud the two paths forward being offered by our bipartisan colleagues in the Senate."
February 27, 2020 Press Release
"With the announcement that the markup has been postponed for the USA FREEDOM Reauthorization Act, we would like to request that the Committee markup our bipartisan bill, the Safeguarding Americans' Private Records Act."
January 24, 2020 Press Release
"Congress must do its job to uphold the Constitution by reforming Section 215 to ensure it isn’t misused to spy on Americans."
July 10, 2019 In The News

State and federal lawmakers are calling for new rules and investigations surrounding the use of facial-recognition scans of driver’s license databases by Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other agencies, fueling a debate over the technology some on Capitol Hill have said represents a “massive breach of privacy and trust.”